I used to think I didn’t like
futuristic novels but I’ve lately been blown away by two: Station
Eleven by Emily St John Mandel and About Sisterland by
Martina Devlin, published by Dublin literary imprint Ward River Press. I’m delighted to welcome Martina to the blog today to talk
about her book.
Author Martina Devlin |
About Sisterland is an atmospheric, thoughtful,
intriguing look at the pitfalls of gender dominated society, in this case, a
world ruled by women. There is nothing usual about this book, especially in an
Irish context where we are obsessed with our very Irishness. The characters in
About Sisterland have a whole other set of land, geography and identity
questions to grapple with.
Martina was born in Omagh and makes her home in Dublin She has had nine books published; other novels include The House Where
It Happened, a ghost story inspired by Ireland's only mass witchcraft trial,
and Ship of Dreams, about the Titanic disaster. Prizes include the Royal
Society of Literature's VS Pritchett Prize and a Hennessy Literary Award, while
she was twice shortlisted for the Irish Book Awards. A current affairs
commentator for the Irish Independent, she has been named columnist of the year
by the National Newspapers of Ireland. Martina is vice-chairperson of the Irish
Writers Centre.
Welcome, Martina. It’s a pat and,
sometimes, unwelcome question to ask a writer, so apologies in advance, but
where did this novel spring from?
From
two sources. First, because I grew up in the North of Ireland during the
Troubles, where I observed how two communities led separate lives (not educated
together, not living in the same areas) which created the space for extremism
to put down roots. I’m not suggesting that everyone saw the other side as
entirely ‘other’ and separate, but the potential was there. Second, from
reading the work of a groundbreaking social activist and feminist, Charlotte
Perkins Gilman. She wrote an extraordinary short story – ‘The Yellow Wallpaper’
– about postnatal depression long before it was acknowledged as a condition.
But what helped to inspire About Sisterland was her novel, Herland, written 100
years ago and serialised in a magazine she published. It imagines a world ruled
by women – a utopia. There are no negatives. I mulled that over, and reached
the opposite conclusion because women are people and people are never perfect.
Least of all when they lay claim to it. I combined those ideas with a pet hate
which is ‘isms’ and decided to look at extreme versions of some isms including
fundamentalism and feminism.
The novel unfolds effortlessly but at a
great pace. As a writer who doesn’t plot much I am always curious about other
writers’ approach to plot. Can you talk a little about building About
Sisterland?
I don’t plot much either. It
doesn’t work for me. I begin with a character who interests me, and consider
the potential journey he or she might make; also, I have a broad outline in my
head of what a prospective novel might be about – some themes I’d like to
explore. And then I leave myself open (hopefully) for inspiration to shape the
novel once I’m immersed in the writing process. With this book, more than any
other I’ve written, I saw pictures unfurl in my mind like petals opening to the
sun. I had a very clear image of a harmonious and beautiful yet fundamentally
dreadful (because totalitarian) society. Some of it came quickly once I began
to write: the emphasis on controlling emotions which leads to rationing; the
segregation of the sexes which helps to bring about the breakdown of the family
unit; the communal child rearing for indoctrination purposes; the use of memory
control to impose conformity. But other elements were more gradual and only
emerged from draft after draft, such as how and why fantasy would be allowed in
matingplace. I was never entirely sure how the novel would end while I was
writing it.
Concrete naming is important in About
Sisterland and everything, from people to places to procreative sex, are named
with flair and imagination; you write about babyfusion (pregnancy), moes
(emotions), Himtime (sex for conception) and many more brilliantly conceived
terms. How did you approach the crucial business of naming things?
Language is fluid so I thought it likely that
many of today’s familiar terms would be replaced in a future society. Once I
began, it was a lot of fun for me. I’ve always liked to make up words anyhow.
This gave me carte blanche. Babyfusion was the first term I invented, and I
intended it both as a positive and negative. It plays with the idea of the
child and mother (or source, as I call her) being combined until birth, with
the utter dependendcy of the unborn child. But I wanted to suggest an unusual
relationship between the two in Sisterland, due to the highly stratified
society, and fusion has a word association with nuclear fusion and the negative
implications of the atomic bomb. Lia Mills, who read an early version,
suggested ‘meet’ to me for men chosen to mate because it suggests ‘meat’ which
dehumanises the men. As, indeed, Sisterland does dehumanise them.
I kept thinking about celebrity culture
as I read the book, as much as about the patriarchy. Was the revering of
celebrities on your mind as you wrote?
Not
initially, but as the book took shape it began to occur to me – in the sense
that human beings seem to need to invent deities. Humankind alone is rarely
enough for people. And celebrities have certainly acquired godlike status in
today’s society. We iconise people who are important to our culture. I was also
thinking about how information is manipulated, Magdalene laundries, what
happens when the oppressed become the oppressor, asylum seekers, and how women
around the world are denied education and persuaded or forced to cover
themselves in public. In Sisterland, it’s the men who are illiterate and
obliged to cover up. Dermot Bolger made me laugh recently. He said: “How on
earth do you women treat men in Omagh?” That’s my hometown. But, of course,
Sisterland is nowhere and everywhere.
Lia Mills interviewed me last year and
began with the bald question ‘Why are you a writer?’ It’s a good question so,
Martina, why are you a writer?
I
think of myself as a storyteller rather than a writer and that applies to
whatever kind of writing I’m doing, whether a newspaper column, radio essay,
short story or novel. As to why I’m a storyteller, it’s because I grew up hearing
stories from my parents. Whenever I think back to my childhood I hear their
voices telling me about Cúchulain and other Celtic legends, or the stories from
their own childhoods, or ghost stories. There were a lot of ghost stories by
the fireside! The oral tradition was very strong, though we all read a lot as
well. Libraries are my favourite place. I owe a great deal to them.
What is your writing process – morning
or night – longhand or laptop?
Morning
is best, even though I don’t think of myself as a morning person, and I write
on a laptop. My cat Chekhov seems to enjoy hearing my fingers click on it and
always positions himself in whichever room I’m working. He gives the appearance
of snoozing while I work – but if I stop he opens his eyes and looks
disapproving. He’s a very elegant slavedriver.
Who are your favourite women writers and why?
Brace yourself, it’s
a long list. Jennifer Johnston, Margaret Atwood, Maria Edgeworth, Sarah Waters,
Hilary Mantel, Catherine Dunne, Sylvia Townsend Warner, Joyce Carol Oates, Emma
Donohoe, Marilynne Robinson, Christine Dwyer Hickey, Charlotte Bronte, Elizabeth
Taylor, Virginia Woolf. I’ll stop now, although there are more. What they share
in common is an ability to transport the reader to the time, place or situation
they write about. In addition, I admire the way some of them switch genres from
one book to the next – either because they choose not to be defined by genre or
because they allow the story to dictate the genre.
What one piece of advice would you
offer beginning writers?
Don’t write for
the market. Write the kind of book you’d like to read. Even if you think it’s
beyond your ability, stretch yourself and reach for that.
You are very diverse as a writer:
you’re a journalist and your last novel before this was historical fiction. If
it’s not too cheeky to ask, what can we expect from you next?
The journalism only takes up one day a week –
it’s a toe in the water rather than all-consuming – an arrangement which allows
me time and space for novels. In particular, I love historical fiction,
especially the research – currently I’m spending a lot of time in Dublin’s
National Library delving into the 1500s. The Pearse Library in Dublin is
another useful resource. But it’s early days yet. Sometimes I walk away from
projects after a period of research if the story doesn’t take shape in my mind.
However, I do have a strong female character, an outsider, whose voice is
becoming clearer to me every day. So fingers crossed.
Wishing you all the luck (and sales) in
the world with About Sisterland, Martina. It’s a wonderful novel.
Readers, you can buy it here, currently on sale for just €12.99.
3 comments:
Thanks for this lovely interview, Martina and Nuala. Great questions and I loved Martina's answers about story coming first over market, genre etc., and story coming before writer. I've been reading Perkins-Gillman, so I'm really looking forward to reading About Sisterland - I've just ordered my copy. Very best of luck with this book!
Thanks a million, Rae. No doubt Martina will be delighted to know she's being read in New Zealand x
Thanks a million, Rae. No doubt Martina will be delighted to know she's being read in New Zealand x
Post a Comment